Maryland · Lot 2026.10
Who owns physicaltherapy in Maryland.
Every Medicare billing organisation physical therapists in Maryland bill through, grouped into the platforms that own them where a public source shows the tie. 41 % of therapists in group practices bill through a therapy platform. Newest Medicare file published 27 July 2026.
- physical therapists in Maryland group practices
- 2,669
- bill through 12 therapy platforms
- 1,088
- practices with 3+ PTs, no platform tie found
- 83
- billing organisations with PTs
- 347
01 / Platforms
The therapy platforms in Maryland.
Physical therapists billing Medicare through each platform's entities in this state in the newest file, and their change over 12 months. Home-based and contract-therapy platforms bill from fewer offices than they serve.
| Platform | Kind | PTs | 12 months |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATI Physical Therapy | outpatient clinics | 336 | +2 |
| Athletico Physical Therapy | outpatient clinics | 310 | −13 |
| Luminis Health | academic or hospital | 278 | +12 |
| FOX Rehabilitation | home-based | 208 | +4 |
| U.S. Physical Therapy | outpatient clinics | 68 | −27 |
| Evolution Physical Therapy and True Sports (O2) | outpatient clinics | 63 | +9 |
| Upstream Rehabilitation | outpatient clinics | 50 | +5 |
| Phoenix Physical Therapy | outpatient clinics | 49 | −3 |
| Select Medical | outpatient clinics | 49 | +6 |
| HealthPRO Heritage | contract therapy | 9 | −6 |
| Confluent Health | outpatient clinics | 8 | +1 |
| Legacy Healthcare Services | contract therapy | 5 | −1 |
| Origin | outpatient clinics | 3 | +2 |
02 / Areas
Where in Maryland.
Physical therapist listings at current sites in CMS Care Compare, by three-digit ZIP area (named by its largest city), the share at a therapy platform's sites, and the largest platform there. Home-based platforms are left out: they list every therapist at one office.
| Area | PT listings | On platforms | Largest platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia (ZIP 210) | 648 | 37 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Baltimore (ZIP 212) | 445 | 28 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Laurel (ZIP 207) | 328 | 47 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Germantown (ZIP 208) | 324 | 36 % | Athletico Physical Therapy |
| Owings Mills (ZIP 211) | 297 | 61 % | Luminis Health |
| Frederick (ZIP 217) | 294 | 34 % | Athletico Physical Therapy |
| Annapolis (ZIP 214) | 139 | 21 % | Luminis Health |
| Waldorf (ZIP 206) | 105 | 20 % | Athletico Physical Therapy |
| Salisbury (ZIP 218) | 81 | 33 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Elkton (ZIP 219) | 53 | 70 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Silver Spring (ZIP 209) | 50 | 52 % | ATI Physical Therapy |
| Easton (ZIP 216) | 49 | 49 % | Luminis Health |
03 / Checks
How far this state was checked.
Platform ties: Texas' table was built by hand; elsewhere ties are matched automatically. In 6 more states a random draw of ties and of practices with no tie found was searched by hand against a bar set before the search; a check not met is shown as not met, and its failed ties were taken out. The other 44 states have automatic checks only.
| Platform ties | automatic checks only |
|---|---|
| Practices with no tie found | automatic checks only |
The 2026 report, with the method and every check (PDF) →
Sources: Medicare Fee-For-Service Public Provider Enrollment (PECOS), published 27 July 2026; NPI registry (NPPES), published September 2026; Care Compare: Doctors and Clinicians, published 10 September 2026.
The state table is free to download and cite (CC BY 4.0): Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23218926, all versions) · Kaggle.
04 / Questions
Short answers.
Who owns physical therapy practices in Maryland?
In Medicare's newest file, 1,088 of 2,669 physical therapists in Maryland group practices (41 %) bill through 12 therapy platforms; the largest is ATI Physical Therapy with 336. 83 practices with 3 or more therapists have no platform tie found.
Where do these Maryland numbers come from?
CMS's Medicare enrollment (PECOS), NPI registry (NPPES) and Care Compare files, with each platform tie taken from a public source such as a clinic list, press release or SEC filing, and dated by when it became public.
How accurate is the Maryland data?
Platform ties: automatic checks only. Practices with no tie found: automatic checks only. Failed checks are shown, not hidden; the method is on the proof page.
Ask for the Maryland workbook.
The same two workbooks as the Texas sample: every billing organisation by quarter, the practices with no tie found by name, and every tie with its source.